Top 10 ArticlesLS-StudioGayRomeo Justus_Dahinden Mercedes Benz OM601 Diyanet İşleri Başkanlığı Radically 25 Ral color system RTLnow.de New concept Electromagnetic compatibility |
News: |
A and others v. Secretary of State for the Home Department; X and another v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] UKHL 56 was a case heard before the Appellate Committee of the House of Lords in the United Kingdom regarding the indefinite detention of the so-called Belmarsh detainees. The ruling also issued a Declaration of Incompatibility with the Human Rights Act 1998 in regards to section 23 of the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001.[1] The case should not be confused with the A and Others v. Secretary of State for the Home Department (No. 2) [2005] UKHL 71 case which relates to the use of evidence obtained by torture in British courts.
Contents |
The case began with 10 men who challenged a decision of the Special Immigration Appeals Commission to eject them from the country on the basis that there was evidence of them being a threat to national security.
Of the 10 appellants, all except 2 were detained in December 2001; the others were detained in February and April 2002 respectively. All were detained under the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001.[2] Under section 25 of this Act, they had the legal right to appeal to the Special Immigration Appeals Commission against their detention.[3]
The court held that, whilst the detention was legal under the ACSA 2001, this act was incompatible with the articles of the European Convention on Human Rights. Their Lordships issued a declaration of incompatibility, under section 4 of the Human Rights Act 1998, and Parliament decided to replace the ACSA 2001 with the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005[4]
|
Custom Search
|
© Copyright 2011 WorldLingo All rights reserved.